JLL’s first important signal is that demand has not disappeared. Leasing activity rose 7.6 percent compared with the same quarter a year earlier, net absorption stayed positive for the third straight quarter, and several major cities posted gains in occupied space.
That matters because the market is often still described in broad decline terms. The report instead points to a more selective environment where organisations are still willing to commit, but only when the office clearly supports work patterns, business priorities, and the quality level they actually need.
The implication is not that the market is back in an old sense. It is that demand has become more demanding.
Supply is tightening at the same time
JLL also notes that total office stock has fallen more than 25 million square feet below its late-2023 peak and that the development pipeline is the lowest in JLL’s recorded data. New construction starts were below 1 million square feet during the quarter.
This changes the decision environment. Organisations waiting for the ideal option may find fewer high-quality choices coming to market, especially in the locations and building types that remain attractive.
That is one reason passive search processes perform badly in selective markets. The brief needs to be sharper earlier.
Quality matters more than average market numbers
The report also shows modest rent growth and major leasing activity at high rental levels. That does not mean the whole market is strong. It means the right part of the market is still being rewarded.
For many occupiers, the more useful question is not what average rents are doing. It is whether the organisation’s actual workplace need matches the part of the market that still commands strong demand.
That often shifts the comparison from more space versus less space to a more strategic test: less space but better space, or cheaper space that weakens performance, identity, and long-term flexibility.
Stress still creates opportunity and risk
JLL reports that investment activity increased while distress continued to rise. Delinquency reached 11.41 percent, and some buildings that reset at lower pricing are improving under new ownership.
That is an important double signal. Some organisations will find better opportunities in a stressed market. Others will misread instability as a reason to wait. The difference usually comes down to preparation: clarity on workplace need, acceptable trade-offs, and the willingness to act when the right option appears.
What organisations still get wrong
Common mistakes include:
- relying on historic occupancy assumptions instead of current behaviour
- focusing on cost before function and quality fit
- delaying strategic choices until after the shortlist is formed
- treating location as a real estate issue instead of a business and workplace issue
In a more selective market, these mistakes become more expensive.
What better organisations do before the next move
The organisations that move well in this type of market usually define more upfront:
- the role the office should play
- the amount of space actually required
- the quality level justified by the business case
- the trade-off between flexibility, identity, cost, and timing
That usually leads to a stronger decision base with usage-led workplace evidence, scenario comparisons, and a shortlist brief that turns strategy into a more disciplined search process.
This is where WeOffice should be distinct. The value is not only market interpretation, but turning market signals into a workplace-driven location brief that supports faster and better choices.
Four questions to ask before the next move
- What role should the office play in our organisation now?
- How much space do we actually need based on real behaviour and not legacy assumptions?
- What level of quality is justified by the business case?
- Are we making an intentional location decision or simply reacting to market pressure?
JLL’s Q1 2026 report suggests that the office market is not moving back to an old normal. It is moving toward a more selective one. Organisations that want better location outcomes need better data, clearer priorities, and a more active decision model. Those that wait for clarity to return may find themselves choosing from a weaker set of options.
Source: JLL Research, U.S. Office Market Dynamics, Q1 2026, published 2026-04-15.
Next step
Need a clearer next step?
Need to turn market signals into a clearer workplace move? WeOffice can develop a location decision base that compares size, quality, timing, and workplace need before shortlist and lease discussions are locked. A common first step is a scenario review that shows which location logic best supports the business and which trade-offs are actually worth paying for.
FAQ
What does the U.S. office market signal for location strategy?
It shows that demand is still present but much more selective. For occupiers, that means size, location, and quality level have to be defined with more precision before the next move.
Why are average market numbers not enough on their own?
Average rents and broad market indicators do not show whether the available supply actually fits the organisation’s needs. A useful location strategy has to connect market signals to function, work patterns, and business priorities.
What should organisations clarify before the next office decision?
They should define the role the office should play, the amount of space actually needed, and which qualities are worth paying for. That creates a stronger basis before shortlist, lease, or repositioning decisions are locked.